Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print Pin It
Feed Feed

Are government shutdowns ever a good idea?

(page 1 of 2)

From the pages of In Business magazine.

Welcome to "Political Posturing," featuring opposing views on current issues important to Wisconsin's business community. In this column, small business owner Brad Werntz and manufacturing manager Steve Witherspoon offer their opinions from the left and the right, respectively.

No, and our weakling of a president once said so.

By Brad Werntz

I am going to do something unexpected here and share a quote by our president that I somewhat agree with: “A shutdown falls on the president’s lack of leadership. He can’t even control his own party and get people together in a room. A shutdown means the president is weak.”

Of course, when the current president said this it was in 2013, he wasn’t the president, and it was intended as an insult for President Obama. But, you know, when it’s straight from the horse’s mouth like this, it’s hard not to hold that horse’s you know what accountable for what he said. Why? Because he’s mostly right, and I’ll give him that.

Why just “mostly right?” Well, because shutdowns are indeed symptoms of weakness in Washington. The shutdown of 2013 was created by a weak, GOP-controlled Congress and led by U.S. Senator and failed presidential candidate Ted Cruz.

But our president proudly owns this most recent one: “If we don’t get what we want, one way or the other...I will shut down the government…I am proud to shut down the government.” Note that in both cases the instigators caved and didn’t get what they wanted because a shutdown is a loser’s gambit, initiated out of weakness. So, that means that, yes, our president is weak.

But we knew that already. However, just because you’re weak it doesn’t mean that you can’t cause some real damage. While it’s too soon to gauge all of the impact that the shutdown had, we do know what happened in 2013.

Just one example: The Outdoor Industry Association estimates that the 2013 shutdown cost communities adjacent to National Parks $42 million per day, and that was just the impact to the economy. This current shutdown caused damage to Joshua Tree National Park alone that will take an estimated 300 years to repair. How do you put a price tag on that?

So, are shutdowns ever a good idea? For most everyone, it’s a strong no, nein, non. But from the Russian judge: “Da!” Is that a mixed response? I don’t think so.

Brad Werntz is a small business owner in Madison.


Add your comment:
Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print Pin It
Feed Feed
Edit ModuleEdit ModuleShow Tags

Events Calendar

Edit ModuleEdit Module
Edit Module