Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print Pin It
Feed Feed

Feb 16, 201501:14 PMTransportation Matters

with Debby Jackson

We have transportation funding options; we just need to level with ourselves

(page 1 of 2)

The warning bells about growing debt levels in Wisconsin’s transportation fund have been sounded by commissions, legislators, the media, and stakeholder groups for several years now. That’s why it wasn’t terribly surprising that the Walker administration’s proposal to ramp up bonding in the transportation fund to $1.3 billion over the next two years went over like an osmium balloon. (Osmium is twice as dense as lead, by the way.)

But some have asked if this is an overreaction. Is it really so bad to borrow for big capital projects like rebuilding our freeways? Aren’t those just the types of projects that should be paid for over a period of time?

Debt is a completely legitimate financing mechanism for transportation projects. However, just like with our personal budgets, you need to have a plan and the discipline to stick to it. A monthly payment for a house mortgage or a car payment is fine if those payments are not consuming more and more of your disposable income every year. Debt is a financing tool, not a funding tool. There is a big difference.

In 2002, Wisconsin spent about 7% of its transportation budget on debt service. That number has ballooned to 17%. That’s a trend line that’s clearly unsustainable. If state legislators embrace the administration’s proposal, which they don’t seem ready to do, the amount of the budget eaten up by debt would leap to 25%. In fact, debt service would become the second-biggest program in the DOT budget — larger than general transportation aids to local governments or the southeast freeway megaprojects. Only the highway rehabilitation program would be larger.

The initial reaction from lawmakers in both parties has been encouraging. There have been bold statements about finding a more sustainable plan for transportation. Now for the hard part — settling on a solution. This has eluded Wisconsin for the past decade.

(Continued)

Feb 18, 2015 04:28 pm
 Posted by  Anonymous

If we are going to be open and honest, we need to be open to cutting the number of planned highway expansions which is the primary source of the gap between current funding and supposed "needs". Speaking of needs, we need to be honest with ourselves that roads are no longer as critical to growing our economy as they once were. Sure, we have all grown accustomed to a level of service that is the result of expanding on the assumption of high growth in VMT forever, but even AASHTO now realizes that the growth that justified expansions in the past is no longer going to occur.

This declining return on investment in highways was almost entirely absent from the discussion from the first moment the Transportation Finance and Policy commission was considered, until Craig Thompson's article today. That needs to end - it is time to be open and honest to all the options and about all facts.

Add your comment:
Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print Pin It
Feed Feed
Edit Module

About This Blog

 Debby Jackson assumed the role of executive director of the Transportation Development Association of Wisconsin after more than 15 years with the organization. In addition to her vast experience in association management and transportation advocacy, Jackson has a background in business. She leverages the breadth and depth of her professional experience, along with her knowledge of the membership and mission of TDA, to be a strong voice for robust transportation infrastructure in Wisconsin. Jackson started her career as a staff auditor with Price Waterhouse, which led to a series of accounting and corporate management positions with a major national retailer.

Recent Posts

Archives

Feed

Atom Feed Subscribe to the Transportation Matters Feed »

Edit Module