Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print Pin It
Feed Feed

Jul 15, 201309:59 AMThe Bottom Line

with contributors from Associated Bank

The unintended consequences of quantitative easing

(page 2 of 2)

So what should an investor do in this environment? The best answer is to carefully review your investment objectives and make sure they align with your investment portfolio. And dig in. If your investment objective is to “beat the S&P 500,” challenge yourself and ask why this is so important. Perhaps it is more important to have a portfolio that performs more steadily with less volatility than the market as a whole; or perhaps there is a lifetime goal such as a part-time position that enables you to volunteer with a favorite charity. That goal may be very attainable with far less risk than a goal of simply beating an arbitrary stock market index, so think about it.

Recently, a Facebook shareholder was quoted as saying to Mark Zuckerberg that Facebook’s stock has been a “disaster.” Really? A move from its initial price of $35 to $24 — that’s a disaster? Not all stocks go up all the time. If that move, in what should be one stock from a well-diversified portfolio, qualifies as a “disaster,” perhaps that investor should visit Moore, Okla.

After a reality check, any portfolio adjustments should be given time. The U.S. economy has proved its mettle time and again. Widely forecasted disasters rarely seem to come to fruition. For example, just five years ago headlines about global energy shortages were plentiful. Today, we’re talking about U.S. energy independence. A carefully constructed, well-balanced investment portfolio is the best way to participate in the amazing resilience of the U.S. economy. It is also the best way to help you attain your true long-term financial goals.

Click here to sign up for the free IB ezine – your twice-weekly resource for local business news, analysis, voices, and the names you need to know. If you are not already a subscriber to In Business magazine, be sure to sign up for our monthly print edition here.

Jul 24, 2013 06:37 pm
 Posted by  Anonymous

Without quantitative easing you guys wouldn't be around. We save Associated with the Tarp and now you complain about QE. If the banks wouldn't have been destructive lenders addicted to high returns,then we wouldn't have had to bail you out. No lending has been pulled back so far is destroying the economy. If it wasn't for the Fed and note we own not Associated, then we would have had a bigger depression. I don't care what the economist use as definitions, we had a depression!

Add your comment:
Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print Pin It
Feed Feed