Apr 17, 201301:58 PMOpen for Business
with Jody Glynn Patrick
Can bonuses actually be demotivating?
(page 1 of 2)
IB completed annual performance reviews in March, during which we also evaluated the entire operation, from mission to process to outcomes. I scheduled at least an hour for every employee to sit down not only with his or her manager, but also with me or Jon, the associate publisher, for a one-on-one conversation about successes, challenges, opportunities, and suggestions for overall company improvement.
First, IB’s strategic and financial goals are confirmed or realigned. Then we enter into compensation reviews. It’s my job to balance employees’ wants and desires, company resources, and the owner’s reasonable expectation of return on investment. In other words, to do the most good with available funds. Compensation includes salary paid, company contributions to a match-potential 401(k) program, a generous health/dental insurance plan, and a sponsored health club membership. Salary raises haven’t been an automatic entitlement these past few years, but we did offer salary readjustments as people took on more responsibilities. In some cases, we also decreased office hours, effectively implementing a salary rate hike for a position. In other words, like you, we were creative during the recession.
While some companies hire low, then raise to the appropriate salary after a probationary period, I start people at salary, accepting that we pay for training. We lose writing/graphics/sales productivity to instead teach how to use a phone, transfer files, contribute to dashboard reports, or open a database. The more experience a person gains – the more familiarity with process, clients, and co-workers – the more efficient that person becomes and the more responsibility he or she is given. That doesn’t trigger a raise event; it signals the end of well-paid training.
It’s self-serving to assume any company truly motivates employees beyond salary with annual raises or bonus opportunities. Here are some direct-pay options, and the challenges I’ve found with each:
- Company-wide, equal payout bonuses “when the company does well.” Without full financial disclosure and goal-setting, employees don’t see the connection between their direct contributions and outcomes. This one-size-fits-all “manna from heaven” reward immediately becomes an expected part of compensation, even during periods when the company doesn’t do so “well.” Once given, it becomes the expectation, regardless of verbiage.
- Individual pay for performance – very hard to establish and time-consuming to track. These tend to favor people most obviously tied to revenue and/or management responsibilities, demotivating support staff who may also be key contributors. They usually are tied to revenue, not profit, and so the company could be losing money and still owe raises or bonuses. They also set up a competitive environment, if a certain amount is going to be divvied up by a selected group at a specific time. An employee is easily refocused on individual goals rather than working toward the greater good for the company, which might better be served with a team approach to a challenge or opportunity.
Survey results repeatedly show that, yes, you can motivate with money if you first fairly compensate for each position and then set down clear goals – based on open financials – as to what success means for the company and for the employee. I do favor weighted group bonus opportunities (tied to salary rate so that everyone is motivated and everyone has the opportunity to participate), but first employees have to understand things they normally don’t care about, like financials and margins (in almost every survey ever compiled, employees will overestimate profit margins by an average of 80%). (Continued)