Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print Pin It
Feed Feed

Oct 3, 201901:00 PMOpen Mic

Send us your blog for consideration!

The art of splitting up: Best practices for high-net-worth couples who want to separate amicably

(page 1 of 2)

High-net-worth couples who divorce have one option that couples with less resources lack. If the desire is there, the lucrative spouse can afford to fight every step and any aspect of the divorce.

The spouse can hire several lawyers, forensic accountants, psychologists, appraisers, vocational evaluators, and private investigators — to name just a few of the experts available to them — and amass an army against the other spouse. It is a luxury enjoyed by only a few for whom cost is not a factor and who are driven by raw emotions to punish the other spouse. The divorce becomes a stomping ground for the spouse’s sense of “justice,” which often translates to vindication, revenge, and to instill financial or emotional pain onto the other spouse.

Yet, there is a cost to this approach far beyond the lawyer and expert fees, a cost to that person’s own mental well-being and very often the health and development of their children. This scorched-earth approach means that the person will be involved in years of litigation with much of that time consumed with lawyers and experts scrutinizing, evaluating, and critiquing their lives and past decisions. They will be judged as a spouse, parent, employee, and person. They will live in a constant state of anxiety, stress, uncertainty, and often bitterness and anger. This is what money can buy them if they wish to pursue an adversarial divorce.

There is a better way. A couple separating can make a commitment to divorce amicably. What this involves is putting aside their hurt feelings, emotions, and even guilt, and approaching the division of their assets, debts, and income much like a business transaction. This may seem unrealistic and clinical for the end of a marriage, but this is, in fact, what the court would do in a divorce trial. Wisconsin abolished fault-based divorces, which means the court is not interested in knowing the reasons why the parties divorced, nor will they assign blame to either spouse for the divorce occurring.

Instead, we have legal presumptions and statutory factors the court will consider in how to divide the property and determine maintenance (i.e., alimony) that has nothing to do with who lied to whom during the marriage. With respect to the children’s custody and placement, the overriding legal inquiry is what is in the best interests of each child, which has little to do with whether one spouse cheated on the other spouse. This is often a harsh reality for many divorcing couples to accept. Yet, understanding what is and is not relevant in a divorce proceeding is important for divorcing spouses while working toward an amicable resolution.

The first step toward an amicable divorce is to select the right attorney. Some attorneys are better at resolving conflict and reaching an amicable resolution than others. The public has a perception of attorneys based on television and movies, which portrays the attorney in the courtroom aggressively questioning the other party into submission on the witness stand.

Although that is a valued trait in the context of litigation, it does not serve the client well if the objectives are to avoid the courtroom and to co-parent with their former spouse after the divorce. In contrast, some people may perceive an attorney who recommends cooperation and compromise as weak and less effective. An excellent attorney is one who can litigate when necessary but recognizes the benefits and value of coming to a resolution outside of the courtroom.

A lawyer serves a dual role to the client. The first is to advocate for the client. The second is less riveting and rarely portrayed on television but is just as important. It is to counsel the client about reasonable and fair legal outcomes. In this role, the attorney will sometimes share information that the client does not necessarily want to hear but needs to. It is where the strengths and weaknesses of the case are discussed, and settlement terms are outlined — terms that may not be perceived as a “win” to the client but do provide a fair and reasonable outcome under the circumstances.

So how do you find that right attorney? The best resource for selecting an attorney is from a past client. Most people know someone who has gone through a divorce. Ask that person what he or she thought of their attorney and whether they would recommend him or her. Sometimes, people will not recommend their own attorney, but the attorney of his or her former spouse instead.

If you are not comfortable confiding in others about your pending divorce, then the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers offers a directory of family law attorneys who have met rigorous standards based on experience, reputation, and successfully passing both a state and national exam specific to family law matters, mostly involving issues impacting high-net-worth clients.

Finally, it cannot be stressed enough the value of meeting with several attorneys to determine which attorney is the best fit for you. You will want someone who you can trust to represent your interests. Do not worry about offending the attorney by asking questions about the attorney’s practice, skills, and approach to cases. Ask how long the attorney has been practicing law, what percentage of his or her practice is dedicated to family law, and is he or she experienced with the assets involved in your case? At the end of your initial consultation, ask yourself whether the attorney seemed knowledgeable in their responses to your questions.

(Continued)

Add your comment:
Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print Pin It
Feed Feed