Edit Module
Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print Pin It
Feed Feed

May 19, 201612:43 PMOpen Mic

Send us your blog for consideration!

Overtime rules are just government interference in the workplace

(page 1 of 2)

This week, President Obama’s Department of Labor moved forward with extensive changes to the nation's overtime regulations. The stated intent of the new rule is to raise the wages of approximately 4 million workers. But in reality, the Obama administration’s latest fiat will not be good for employers, workers, or the economy.

The aggressive change, which goes into effect on Dec. 1, 2016, qualifies employees who earn $47,476 for overtime after working 40 hours in a week, which is more than a 100% increase from the current threshold of $23,660. While that amount has admittedly not been raised in a number of years, doubling it overnight far outpaces inflation and could have dire consequences. In fact, the last time the threshold was changed was in 2004. If one would adjust for inflation from 2004 to 2016, the new level would be just under $30,000.

The path forward for employers to comply with the new edict will vary according to individual circumstances. Any employee who is currently salaried and falls between the two thresholds will have to have their situation evaluated and adjusted. They will need to be shifted from salaried to hourly and start punching a time clock, or they will have to have their wages increased to comply with the new salary level.

For employees who put in varied hours, for instance a sales representative, the employer will also have to decide what level to set their new hourly compensation, knowing that some times of the year will require more hours per week than others. Other employers may instead not allow employees to put in time over 40 hours per week, creating additional staffing needs at the company. Or, employers may split job duties. For instance, if a worker currently puts in around 50 hours per week, the employer now has to decide whether to pay that person time and a half for hours over 40, or split the duties into two jobs, with each person making part time wages.

Overall, the rule is expected to cost employers over $1 billion annually. While that does mean additional money in the hands of a small percentage of workers, it also likely means benefit cuts elsewhere, reduced pay for many, reduced status from salaried to hourly, and less money for investment by the employer into R&D, expansions, and new hires.


May 20, 2016 11:04 am
 Posted by  Anonymous

our organization will reduce hours and convert to hourly from salary; I know of at least 7 others who will be doing the same thing - and that is just this week; would guess I'll know 100+ who will do this by December; there is no understanding of 'finite' resource as you have said by this administration;

Add your comment:
Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print Pin It
Feed Feed
Edit Module

About This Blog

Make your voice heard with IB's "Open Mic." Send your blog entry to Online Editor Jason Busch at jason@ibmadison.com for consideration.



Atom Feed Subscribe to the Open Mic Feed »

Recent Posts

Edit Module