Aug 27, 201901:09 PMOpen Mic
Send us your blog for consideration!
One tax year later: Assessing the implications of the Tax Cut and Jobs Act
(page 2 of 2)
Individuals reap benefits of tax reform — with some surprises
The Tax Cut and Jobs Act brought fundamental changes that significantly impacted individuals — both their investments and personal taxes.
From an investment perspective, the stock market benefited from increased earnings and repatriated profits. Tax reform created a near-term “sugar high” that helped fuel GDP growth in excess of 4 percent in 2018, but that growth began to slow in 2019.
Hundreds of billions of dollars of earnings and repatriated profits were paid out in the form of dividends to shareholders or were invested in capital improvements. A significant portion also went into share buybacks, and while criticized in the media and by politicians, buybacks are a return of capital to shareholders that typically improves the company’s balance sheet over time. Shareholders use dividends or repurchased shares to funnel cash into other investments in the economy, fueling other benefits down the road which are harder to measure.
From an individual perspective, one of the most important impacts of the TCJA that we’ve seen is that many people were surprised to find higher tax bills. Most expected a tax cut given the extensive media coverage around tax reform. Some earning between $150,000 and $300,000 found that they were instead negatively affected.
Many of those with higher tax bills were more significantly affected by the cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions. Tax withholding tables were adjusted to reflect lower tax rates but weren’t adjusted to reflect any of the changes to deductions.
Many taxpayers who had in the past been subject to the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT), an alternative calculation that assures that tax payers with a lot of deductions pay at least a minimum tax, were not subject to it in 2018. In the past, it is estimated that three quarters of people in high-tax states were subject to AMT and thus unable to take the SALT deduction. With new higher AMT thresholds, many of those taxpayers are eligible to take the now limited SALT deduction.
Thinking differently about deductions
While the tax bill raised the standard deduction, it reduced many other write-offs. This means that many high earners must now think differently about how they will manage their taxable income going forward. The increase in the standard deduction to $12,000 for individuals and $24,000 for couples meant that many of those making under $100,000 didn’t need to itemize. For those earning north of that, up to $300,000, many found a greater portion of their income subject to tax and were forced to reconsider their strategy. For example, before 2018, many had moved to making Roth IRA and 401(k) contributions. But when facing the reduction in eligible deductions under the TCJA, some wealthy taxpayers need to reconsider making those contributions on a pretax basis in order to lower taxable income. This can be especially true for those potentially eligible for the new QBI deduction who may be bumping up against the income limitations (see above).
Very high-income earners — those between $300,000 and $1 million — found that income planning under the new tax law is more complex. These high earners often receive other compensation beyond a salary and bonus. This additional complexity requires these taxpayers to pay careful attention to how and when they are compensated.
For many residing in high-tax states on the coasts or elsewhere, the new tax law brings a question about where they plan to reside in retirement, with some carefully considering permanently relocating to lower-tax areas.
High earners also found a need to reassess their allocation to the municipal bond market for two main reasons. First, changes to deductions meant that more taxable income may now be subject to taxation. Secondly, the current low interest rate environment and very narrow spreads have led to many moving out of municipal bonds and into taxable bonds on the shorter end of the yield curve while owning longer maturity municipal bonds. The absolute level of interest rates is historically low, making managing bonds more complex.
The TCJA surprised many with the new higher estate tax exemption. While this only affects a small number of families, the law now allows individuals to transfer $11.4 million and couples to transfer $22.8 million in 2019, up from $5.49 million and $10.98 million in 2017. Those affected are thinking carefully about transferring wealth tax-free before this provision sunsets in 2026.
Significant TCJA changes affecting individuals
- A higher standard deduction means fewer individual will itemize.
- The TCJA eliminated personal exemptions — valued at $4,050 in 2017 for the taxpayer, spouse and each dependent — and boosted standard deductions to $12,000 for single filers ($24,000 for married joint filers).
- Cap on SALT (state and local taxes) deduction of $10,000
- The SALT cap affects taxpayers in high-tax states.
- Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)
- The TCJA significantly increased exemption amounts for 2018–2025, as well as thresholds after which the exemption is phased out. While fewer taxpayers will be affected by the AMT, higher-income earners and those that exercise stock options are still at risk.
- Estate tax exemption
- Increases to $11.18 million in 2018 and 11.4 million per person in 2019, up from $5.49 million
- Increases to $22.36 in 2018 and $22.8 million per couple in 2019 up from $10.98 million
- Provision sunsets in 2026
Mary Pat Williams is vice president commercial banking and Brian Andrew EVP wealth and chief investment officer of Johnson Financial Group.
Click here to sign up for the free IB ezine — your twice-weekly resource for local business news, analysis, voices, and the names you need to know. If you are not already a subscriber to In Business magazine, be sure to sign up for our monthly print edition here.