Dec 1, 201402:32 PMMinority Biz Report
with Sam Owens
How Madison hit the proverbial wall in the race to equity
(page 1 of 2)
Since the first installment of Minority Biz Report, some readers have asked me what inspired me to create this blog. One of the motivating forces was my dissatisfaction with our local media’s coverage of the economic state of affairs within Madison’s black communities.
Generally, our media’s treatment of the topic is woefully one-dimensional and lacking in ideological diversity. Instead of lamenting in private, I created this blog so that I could constructively contribute to public thought and discourse on Madison’s race to equity. For the sake of keeping with the runner’s analogy that drives the Race to Equity brand, I can say that Madison has hit the wall and desperately needs to catch a second wind.
Capitalizing (on) the Race to Equity Report
When the Wisconsin Council on Children and Families published its Race to Equity Report, it created an ideal opportunity to encourage inclusive dialogue about how every government agency, person, and business could contribute to racial equity. Likewise, our local media have a valuable role to play with respect to the public’s knowledge of racial inequities.
However, we are reaching a tipping point in which local media consign “leadership” on racial inequities exclusively to an elite cohort of nonprofit executives. If our media fail to provide a fair and balanced platform in which other stakeholders (including working families, small businesses, and young professionals) can demonstrate leadership, then we are more likely to create a nonprofit industrial complex, instead of maximizing net improvements in racial equity.
Media’s social responsibility to the public
For the majority of people who have not personally experienced being black and/or under-resourced, local media are the main source of information about the nature and scope of the economic crisis within Madison’s black communities. Because of local media’s critical role in disseminating valuable information to the public, our news platforms should investigate and report news with a view toward continually adding context, depth, and clarity to a story.
However, local media tend to myopically focus on an exclusive cohort of nonprofit executives who presumably share the same relatively narrow set of ideological views and financial interests while monopolizing public discourse on racial inequities. Consequently, the general public is deprived of a global understanding of economic underdevelopment within Madison’s black communities.
The trouble with nonprofit economics
To be fair, all these nonprofit leaders are simply doing their jobs — by pipelining press coverage and financial resources toward their particular programs. After all, every nonprofit executive has a fiduciary duty to increase the financial endowments of their employers. In addition, enhancing the impact of nonprofit service delivery is a significant component of Madison’s short-term response to racial inequities.
Nevertheless, stakeholders in Madison’s race to equity would be remiss to deny that financial investment in nonprofit programs (and administration) will necessarily reach a point of diminishing returns — if it hasn’t already. It should not be taboo to critique nonprofit economics; moreover, conversations about how we strategically invest public and private resources should not be limited to an exclusive group of individuals or institutions. That’s just not the Madison way. The Madison brand is about pluralism, facilitating open dialogue, and presenting competing ideas for the betterment of Madison as a whole. The stakes are too high not to have all hands on deck in the design and implementation of solutions to Madison’s racial inequities.
Seeing the big picture
The long-term solution for Madison’s racial inequities is to increase access to gainful employment and economic advancement opportunities. These desired outcomes are best facilitated by private-sector development and restructuring, such that black Madisonians (and other marginalized groups) enjoy equal access to good jobs. In this respect, the utility of nonprofit programs has a foreseeable ceiling, in that they can only provide for the basic needs and fundamental skills development of their program participants; the nonprofit sector is not adequately equipped to independently address the root cause of racial inequities in Madison.