Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print Pin It
Feed Feed

Mar 21, 201410:21 AMBlaska's Bring It!

with David Blaska

Republicans love cancer?

(page 2 of 2)

The Assembly’s $100 cap on out-of-pocket expenses is similar to a bill signed into law by the Democratic governor of Missouri. It’s actually more generous than the legislation enacted by Democrats in California last year, which requires a $200 co-pay.

Speaker Vos explained, “I have heard numerous personal stories about the courageous battles that have been fought against cancer.  It’s hard to find a person who hasn’t been touched by the deadly disease. My grandfather died from colon cancer; my grandmother died from lung cancer. I know that oral chemo treatments could have made their fight a little easier.”

The heartless bastard.

Click here to sign up for the free IB ezine — your twice-weekly resource for local business news, analysis, voices, and the names you need to know. If you are not already a subscriber to In Business magazine, be sure to sign up for our monthly print edition here.

Old to new | New to old
Comments, page 1 of 2 1 2 Next »
Mar 21, 2014 10:44 am
 Posted by  Anonymous

Actually you are totally wrong again Blaska.

the republican held assembly and senate only passed this bill because of public opinion.

If they had their way they would not have passed anything.

vos and fitzgerald are no heroes by any means.

Actually they are both losers in a state that tolerates them.

Mar 21, 2014 05:49 pm
 Posted by  Anonymous

Dave, you conveniently omit Mr. Fitz's machinations to prevent a vote.

Also explain this attribution ...

Vos said last week that he had strong concerns with the proposal and did not think it has enough votes to pass the Assembly.

http://www.leadertelegram.com/news/daily_updates/article_06ebaa75-c25b-53a4-96ab-3ceab2fa3c44.html

With this

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, which polled all 132 state lawmakers, found that 89 of them — majorities in both the Senate and Assembly — voiced support for the bill.

http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/local/govt-and-politics/senate-to-vote-on-bill-to-make-oral-chemotherapy-drugs/article_ea8d165e-05b8-5228-91d9-412f02fe18be.html


Looks like some people wanted the bill to go awayh

Mar 21, 2014 07:33 pm
 Posted by  Anonymous

Anon 10:44:

Yes, public opinion swayed the Republicans. Heartless bastards! Funny how public opinion didn't sway them to undo Act 10.

Mar 22, 2014 09:58 am
 Posted by  David Blaska

I thought the Republican-held Assembly and Senate didn't listen to public opinion. Isn't that what you said about Act 10?

Mar 22, 2014 03:51 pm
 Posted by  Anonymous

Seriously, Dave? Does the term "poison pill" in the legislative context mean anything to you? I'll bet it does. Be honest and treat your readers with a little more respect.
AnonyBob

Mar 23, 2014 09:58 pm
 Posted by  Anonymous

If Dear Leader Comrade Obama wanted you to have oral chemotherapy, he would have said so in his three dozen Imperial decrees changing the Obamacare law so far.

Through the mercy and wise compassion of Dear Leader Obama, you now have been liberated from the burden of caring for grandparents, as the death panels are real and cancer treatments will be withheld from the elderly. Long live the glorious Progressive movement.

Mar 24, 2014 07:43 am
 Posted by  Anonymous

Dave Blaska is so intellectually dishonest he makes the Mar 23, 2014 09:58PM post look sane.

Mar 24, 2014 07:50 am
 Posted by  David Blaska

Anon at March 21, 05:49 p.m. asks, "Dave, you conveniently omit Mr. Fitz's machinations to prevent a vote. ... explain this attribution: 'Vos said last week that he had strong concerns with the proposal and did not think it has enough votes to pass the Assembly.'"

That's why the Assembly added the $100 co-pay.

Mar 24, 2014 08:31 am
 Posted by  Anonymous

Dave, you think a $100 copay makes any real difference to the insurance companies? You know enough to know it was a cynical parliamentary maneuver done for one reason only; to force it to another vote in the Senate on the hectic last day they meet, which will conveniently not happen. "Darn, we just ran out of time." But the GOP can now campaign on supporting it ("See; I voted for it!") while not interrupting that fat flow of campaign money from their insurance industry overlords. Legalized bribery. Vos could have passed a clean version of the bill (the Senate didn't seem to see a need for a $100 copay), but didn't. It's a disgusting manipulation, all too typical of legislative Republicans.
AnonyBob

Mar 24, 2014 08:36 am
 Posted by  Anonymous

Annoying Bob dissembles: Seriously, Dave? Does the term "poison pill" in the legislative context mean anything to you? I'll bet it does. Be honest and treat your readers with a little more respect.-- AnonyBob

While The Squire educates: A poison pill is that portion which defeats the whole. The Senate will concur with the Assembly version, which requires a co-pay smaller than that imposed by the Democrat(ic) regime in California. Perforce, the Assembly's co-pay is not a poison pill.

Comments, page 1 of 2 1 2 Next »
Add your comment:
Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print Pin It
Feed Feed
Edit Module

About This Blog

Raised on a farm near Sun Prairie, David Blaska is a recovering liberal who spent 18 years in daily newspapers, including 12 at The Capital Times in Madison as a reporter and editor. He served Gov. Tommy Thompson as acting press secretary in 1998 and is a veteran and survivor of 19 years in state government. He served 12 years on the Dane County Board of Supervisors. From December 2007 to November 2011 he wrote the consistently popular "Blaska's Blog" for Isthmus online's "The Daily Page" until, he says, the intolerant liberals ran him off. He blogs from Madison.

Recent Posts

Archives

Feed

Atom Feed Subscribe to the Blaska's Bring It! Feed »

Edit Module