Edit Module
Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print Pin It
Feed Feed

Oct 8, 201511:14 AMOpen Mic

Send us your blog for consideration!

Sequence of returns – A significant risk that should not be ignored

(page 1 of 2)

Recent market volatility provides a vivid reminder that markets rarely go up or down steadily. And when markets trend down at a time when an investor is approaching or recently entered retirement, this can be cause for real concern. In fact, sequence of returns is one of the biggest potential risks to a retirement portfolio. Sequence of returns is the order in which investors experience returns.

In football, inside your opponent’s 20-yard line is referred to as the “red zone.” In retirement planning, the five years just prior to the retirement and the five years following retirement are considered to the retirement red zone. An investor just entering retirement who begins withdrawing money and experiences a period of negative returns could find that the timing of these negative returns leads to a significant reduction in their livelihood.

Two investors with the same long-term average return may end up with very different results depending on the order of those returns. Consider these two 20-year scenarios — one starting in 1989 and ending in 2008 and the second a simple reversal of the sequence. In each case, the average annual return is the same 8.43%. But the outcome for the two investors who commence retirement in each of those two years is dramatically different.

Let’s assume both investors:

  • Start with $1 million
  • Invest 100% in an S&P 500 Index Fund
  • Withdraw 5% or $50,000 in the first year
  • Increase annual withdrawal rate for inflation (assuming 3%)

In the first scenario showing 1989 to 2008, an investor experiences several good years, including a 31% gain in the first year. Over 20 years, the portfolio grows to $3.1 million.

In striking contrast, the investor in the second scenario with the reverse sequence of returns faces an immediate downdraft of 37% in the first year followed by significant declines in years seven, eight and nine. That portfolio shrinks to $235,000 after 20 years.

Again, the average annual return in BOTH scenarios is 8.43%. We should point out that this is an extreme example with 100% of the portfolios invested in stocks.

(Continued)

Add your comment:
Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print Pin It
Feed Feed
Edit Module

About This Blog

Make your voice heard with IB's "Open Mic." Send your blog entry to Online Editor Jason Busch at jason@ibmadison.com for consideration.

Archives

Feed

Atom Feed Subscribe to the Open Mic Feed »

Recent Posts

Edit Module