Edit Module
Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print Pin It
Feed Feed

Feb 16, 201511:07 AMOpen Mic

Send us your blog for consideration!

Answers to workplace questions on off-hours events, age discrimination, and severance

(page 1 of 2)

Running a business — or managing a single unit, department, or team within a business — is not easy. Questions that have legal and/or regulatory implications pop up on a regular basis. Answers to some of those questions aren’t always straightforward and can require insight into various statutes as well as case law. This article shares several common scenarios and some interpretive guidance.

Q: Our company plans to sponsor an employee softball team this spring. Employees may choose whether or not to participate, and the events will be held outside of working hours, typically on weekends. Do we have to pay the employees who participate? If an employee gets injured, can he or she file a workers’ compensation claim?

A: As an enforcement policy, the U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division does not consider time that employees spend participating in athletic events to be hours worked, even if the events are sponsored by the employer. For example, your company may sponsor a softball team, but the employees are not working while playing, nor while acting as umpires, referees, or similar officials. This assumes that participation is completely voluntary and that regular employment is not conditioned upon participation in the events. Since participation would not be required as a condition of the job, any injuries that might occur during an event should not be covered by workers’ compensation because the employee was not present as a condition of employment nor engaged in job duties. Many employers will therefore require participants to sign a waiver because employees may be able to file civil lawsuits for injuries that are not covered by workers’ comp.

Q: Recently, we told a very young job applicant that he would not get a position because he did not have enough experience. He later called and suggested that we had discriminated against him based on age. Should we be concerned?

A: At the federal level, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) protects only individuals who are age 40 or older. It does not prevent employers from favoring workers over the age of 40. What’s more, the law certainly doesn’t require your organization to refrain from considering an individual’s job-related experience in your hiring decision. It’s likely that your disgruntled applicant has a misunderstanding of the ADEA’s protections. Of course, if you’re concerned that the applicant might pursue legal action, it’s best to review the situation with an employment attorney.

(Continued)

Add your comment:
Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print Pin It
Feed Feed
Edit Module
Edit Module