Edit Module
Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print Pin It
Feed Feed

Dec 22, 201410:59 AMOpen Mic

Send us your blog for consideration!

Employers need to keep track of criminal records laws

(page 1 of 2)

A growing number of states and cities are passing laws restricting employers from inquiring about or considering a job applicant’s criminal history during the beginning stages of the hiring process. These are widely known as “ban-the-box” laws because they prohibit employers from requiring an applicant to check a box on a job application indicating that he or she has a criminal record.

Ban-the-box laws are intended to remove barriers for individuals who have an arrest or conviction on their record and are seeking employment after rehabilitation. There is variation, however, in the specific requirements of the laws adopted by the 12 states and more than 60 cities that have enacted some form of ban-the-box legislation.

There is also variation in the extent to which employers are covered by these laws. While the majority of states that have passed ban-the-box legislation have enacted laws that cover public employers, several jurisdictions have enacted legislation governing private employers as well. This lack of uniformity in the ban-the-box laws adopted in different jurisdictions has created some confusion for employers, particularly those with multistate operations.

As a general matter, these laws do not require employers to hire individuals with a criminal background, and they still permit employers to conduct background checks later in the hiring process. Rather than prohibiting background checks, these laws direct when employers may ask about criminal history and what types of inquiries (e.g., arrests, convictions, or expungements) are allowed. For example, the ban-the-box laws in some jurisdictions permit employers to ask about an applicant’s criminal record after he or she has been selected to interview. In other jurisdictions, employers are required to wait until a conditional offer of employment has been made.

It’s important to note that even in states or cities with ban-the-box laws, employers may exclude applicants if they are required by state or federal law not to consider candidates who have been convicted of a crime (e.g., when filling certain financial institution positions and certain positions involving children or vulnerable adults).

In addition to ban-the-box laws, there are legal considerations that employers must attend to in regard to inquiries into the criminal backgrounds of employees and job applicants. For example, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued guidance in 2012 in which it proposed a number of best practice suggestions for employers concerning their consideration of arrest and conviction records during the hiring process.

The guidance was intended to offer employers general information and to explain how the use of an individual’s criminal history in making employment decisions may, in some instances, violate the prohibition against employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The EEOC recommended eliminating any blanket exclusion of applicants based on the mere fact of having a criminal record.

The EEOC suggested that when formulating questions for job applications, employers should limit inquiries about criminal history only to those convictions for which exclusion would be job-related for the position in question and consistent with business necessity.

In addition to this EEOC guidance regarding federal law, employers may also be subject to state or local laws that limit the manner in which they may consider the criminal history of job applicants. For example, the Wisconsin Fair Employment Law prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of an arrest or conviction record. The law specifies, however, that it is not employment discrimination to refuse to employ an individual who has been convicted of a felony, misdemeanor, or other offense if the circumstances of that conviction substantially relate to the circumstances of the particular job. The law does not define “substantially relate,” but an analysis of a substantial relationship generally involves a consideration of the nature of the offense compared to the circumstances and description of the position.

In addition, although Wisconsin’s law is not technically a “ban-the-box” law, it does regulate the questions that an employer is permitted to ask on a job application. In particular, while employers generally may inquire about convictions, they are not permitted to ask about arrests on an employment application, except in the context of pending charges.

(Continued)

Add your comment:
Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print Pin It
Feed Feed
Edit Module

About This Blog

Make your voice heard with IB's "Open Mic." Send your blog entry to Online Editor Jason Busch at jason@ibmadison.com for consideration.

Archives

Feed

Atom Feed Subscribe to the Open Mic Feed »

Recent Posts

Edit Module