Edit Module
Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print Pin It
Feed Feed

Feb 27, 201810:11 AMInside Wisconsin

with Tom Still

Continued progress on Wisconsin broadband will require mix of technologies

(page 1 of 2)

When it comes to strengthening Wisconsin’s internet connections, from its most rural settings to underserved neighborhoods in its largest cities, there is no “one-tech-fits-all” solution.

In fact, the blend of technologies required to better connect people, businesses, schools, and emergency responders will range dramatically depending on cost, location, and speed of delivery.

That was made apparent in a Feb. 20 meeting on broadband in Madison, and at a recent gathering of tech professionals and advocates in Washington, D.C. Fortunately, that notion of clearing the way for diverse technology solutions is resonating with most members of the Wisconsin Legislature.

“Broadband” is a general term for a mix of technologies that can connect people and machines to the internet. Those delivery systems range from typically slow dial-up connections to cable and digital subscriber lines; from satellite to public Wi-Fi networks; and from optical fiber to prototype “fixed wireless” antennas on existing power lines.

Here are two examples of technologies getting attention in Wisconsin and elsewhere because of the potential for improved connections:

Small-cell technology is already deployed in many cities and major facilities. It is expected to become the backbone for the rollout of fifth-generation, or 5G, advanced wireless systems across the world. Without it, the full potential of trends such as the “internet of things,” “smart cities,” and autonomous vehicles cannot be tapped.

The Wisconsin Assembly passed a bill (AB 348) in June 2017 that would pave the way for a network of low-profile, small-cell antennas that can be attached to utility poles or building exteriors. The bill would clarify administrative and regulatory rules and allow Wisconsin to join neighboring states — Minnesota, Iowa, Indiana, and Ohio — in encouraging deployment.

Although the bill passed a key Senate committee, it has yet to surface on the floor of the upper house, where the calendar is running short on working days. Unless Wisconsin moves quickly, it runs the risk of falling behind other states in attracting investment and jobs in virtual reality, driverless vehicles, telemedicine, entertainment venues, and connected homes — precisely the areas where 5G can improve speed and service.

Broadcast “white space” describes buffer zones between assigned broadcast channels in the spectrum used to transmit electromagnetic waves.

Wisconsin is on a short list of a dozen states targeted by a coalition led by Microsoft to greatly expand the use of white space, mainly in the television spectrum, to extend high-speed broadband internet service.

Primarily intended for hard-to-serve rural areas, the white space option is attractive because it can operate at speeds four times faster than Wi-Fi and reach up to 16 times farther. Wireless signals can travel over hills, as well as through foliage and buildings, the same qualities that have long allowed rural communities to get strong television signals.

It’s also less expensive — at least, in most rural areas — because the equipment needs appear to be less elaborate than fiber-optic cable or transmitters that must be more densely situated to work. The Federal Communications Commission approved the “white space” option in 2008 but there hasn’t been much progress, in part because broadcasters have reservations.


Old to new | New to old
Feb 28, 2018 07:52 am
 Posted by  Anonymous

Thank you for this as hundreds of thousands of people (not just rural but in inner city black and Latino communities) are on the wrong side of the digital divide. Having internet access problems in my new home on the border of a major black community - I email a friend who runs a lot of online work from his home in rural Dane for help. He linked me to a website that gave me upload and download speeds, I ran the test and yes I was getting 15% of what my contract said I should have. I sent him the results and he replied that his access literally 2 miles from Epic was far worse at times zero. What is interesting in the access discussion is nothing is ever said about accountability. We tend to have "up to" marketing and contracts in internet services. I can't sell you and up to one pound loaf of bread that is actually 2 ounces but many of us are paying for internet access that is a fraction of what we are supposed to have.

Mar 1, 2018 05:52 pm
 Posted by  Anonymous

The public, both rural and urban should be aware that many millions of dollars have been provided over several decades to bring broadband to rural areas of Wisconsin. The governmental fees and outright grants are given to ILECs (Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers, such as AT&T, Frontier, TDS, etc.) specifically for rural broadband expansion. The ILECS can prevent a competitive company from providing service within their designated area, even if they let their lines, poles, and customers rot away. The ILECSs do take that money and put it into new housing developments that would get broadband anyway. If politicians really care, they would require accountability with the money that is given to them, and allow CLECs (Competitive Local Exchange Carriers) to compete for those funds and those rural areas. Opening up White Spaces and 5G Small Cell Technology is only good for the cell phone providers, and would not come close to addressing the real issue of rural broadband and the millions of dollars being handed out for it.

Add your comment:
Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print Pin It
Feed Feed
Edit Module

About This Blog

Tom Still is president of the Wisconsin Technology Council. He is the former associate editor of the Wisconsin State Journal.



Atom Feed Subscribe to the Inside Wisconsin Feed »

Recent Posts

Edit Module